[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intellectual Property II
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Intellectual Property II |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:10:17 +0100 |
Isaac wrote:
[...]
> I believe that I could were a court to recognize that I owned the copy
> of software rather than having license it. Courts in the US don't
> seem to recognize such a thing.
"Other courts have reached the same conclusion: software is sold
and not licensed."
-- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
As for installing on multiple computers, I think that it's totally
OK. For example, I can install it on a computer at my home and on
another computer at my dacha. The key is that I can't legaly run
it simultaneously on multiple computers if I own only one copy. As
long as I don't do that, it's all fine and dandy.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Intellectual Property II, (continued)
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/13
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/07
- Message not available
- Re: Intellectual Property II, John Hasler, 2006/02/07
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Isaac, 2006/02/09
- Re: Intellectual Property II, John Hasler, 2006/02/10
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Isaac, 2006/02/10
- Re: Intellectual Property II, John Hasler, 2006/02/10
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Isaac, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Isaac, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, David Kastrup, 2006/02/11
- Re: Intellectual Property II, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/11