[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:09:38 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[... Wallace vs IBM et all (plus Trolltech) ...]
> They got _permission_.
The GPL is a grant of IP rights established by the copyright and patent
laws, idiot. It's a contract, retard. (The patent license is implied,
not express.)
-----
An intellectual property license is a contract. In re: Aimster Copyright
Litigation, 334 F.3d 643, 644 (7th Cir. 2003) (If a breach of contract
(and a copyright license is just a type of contract) . . . ); see also
McCoy v. Mitsuboshi Cutlery, Inc., 67 F.3d 917, 920 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
(Whether express or implied, a license is a contract").
-----
regards,
alexander.
- Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed, (continued)
- Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/06/28
- Message not available
- Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/28
- Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed, David Kastrup, 2006/06/28
- Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/28
- Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed, David Kastrup, 2006/06/28
- Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/28
- Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed, David Kastrup, 2006/06/28
- Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/28
- Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed, David Kastrup, 2006/06/28
- Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/06/28
- Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed,
Alexander Terekhov <=