[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is source ?
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: What is source ? |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Aug 2006 14:14:38 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov ?terekhov@web.de? writes:
>
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> means that copies downloaded from there will be governed by the GPL.
> >
> > The GPL governs work (rights to it) not copies, stupid.
>
> Nonsense. That would preclude dual-licensing models, for example.
Only in your head.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: What is source ?, (continued)
- Re: What is source ?, David Golden, 2006/08/21
- Re: What is source ?, Wei Mingzhi, 2006/08/22
- Message not available
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/22
- Re: What is source ?, Vincent Rivière, 2006/08/06
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/06
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/07
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/07
- Re: What is source ?,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: What is source ?, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/08/07
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/07
- Re: What is source ?, Tim Smith, 2006/08/19
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/21
Re: What is source ?, Vincent Rivière, 2006/08/12
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/12
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/14
- Re: What is source ?, David Kastrup, 2006/08/14