[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More GPL questions
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: More GPL questions |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:06:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>>
>> > Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> Once you start transforming it through compilers and linkers the
>> >> picture might change, depending on how much of the library is included
>> >> in the transformed source code. If, for example, you execute 'cc -E',
>> >> the resulting source code will contain the whole of "stdio.h", and as
>> >> such it's now most definitely something that is affected by the stdio.h
>> >> copyright (I leave it to Alexander to define if it's a derivative work,
>> >> a compilation, or anything he wishes).
>> >
>> > Mechanical transformation never create derivative works.
>>
>> Sure, but we are not talking about "mechanical transformation", but
>> mechanical _combination_. "cc -E" _includes_ stdio.h and other stuff.
>
> Whatever, retard.
Actually, it also replaces macros. Looks like you have run out of
arguments again.
>> > Legally it's just copying of the original expression without
>> > transforming/modifying creativity resulting in a derivative work. So
>> > your 'cc -E' would simply "mere aggregate" (in GNU speak) original
>> > protected expression from multiple separate and independent works
>> > just like tar (same files tar'ed) would do it (legal effect is the
>> > same).
>>
>> In Terekhov-Lala-land. "Aggregation" is not a term used for creating
>> a functional unit with inseparable components.
>
> Inseparable as in what?
As in: "the original can't be extracted whole again from the final
product and identifiable traces of it are scattered throughout the
whole resulting file".
> Man oh man.
You can say that again.
> Ever heard of postmortem analysis of core dumps, idiot?
Now you are really striking wild.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: More GPL questions, (continued)
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, John Hasler, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, John Hasler, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/18
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
Message not available
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/16
- Message not available
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/16
- Message not available
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/16
Message not availableRe: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17