[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2007 14:25:37 +0200 |
Bilgehan.Balban@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Suppose I used some GPL code (e.g. linux kernel linked lists) in my
> own project, which is also under GPL. However I have the copyright for
> the bits that I wrote, possibly more than a non-trivial %90 of it. Can
> I still dual license the project?
Your project is a "compilation" (this legal term includes
"collective works") under copyright law.
The copyright in that compilation is separate and independent
from copyrights in constituent works and you are the sole owner
of that copyright. You can multi license it all you like.
Individual works compromising the project remain under their
own copyrights and (multi)licenses, if any.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/21
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
Re: GPL question,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, Richard Tobin, 2007/05/15
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/05/15