[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
Tue, 22 May 2007 20:31:44 +0200 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
> So, why distributing non-GPL code alone, which to be functional
> would need to be linked against GPLed code, should be a copyright
> infringment?
>
> Because it is derived of another copyrighted work.
Subsection "derived of another copyrighted work" GNU Copyleft Act
Section 666 ("deriviate work" Guh-NÜ-slash-(C) ueber GNUtian ams).
See also "opiate".
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Paolo Gianrossi, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/22
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2007/05/23
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/23
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/23
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/22
Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/21
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21