[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU "Moral Codes"
From: |
mike3 |
Subject: |
Re: GNU "Moral Codes" |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:27:49 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Aug 25, 9:42 pm, John Hasler <j...@dhh.gt.org> wrote:
> mike3 writes:
> > That's just the word I used. I meant something like, the FSF has no legal
> > influence or power beyond what I called it's "jurisdiction".
>
> The point is that the mere fact that a work is licensed under the terms of
> the GPL does not give the FSF any "jurisdiction" or "power" or "influence"
> over it whatsoever. If they own no copyright in it it is none of their
> business.
Well the FSF could go and campaign against the use of one's
software, couldn't they, just as they campaign against Microsoft's
software? That's what I meant by "power", "influence", etc.
> --
> John Hasler
> j...@dhh.gt.org
> Dancing Horse Hill
> Elmwood, WI USA
- GNU "Moral Codes", mike3, 2007/08/20
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", none, 2007/08/20
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", mike3, 2007/08/24
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", David Kastrup, 2007/08/25
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", mike3, 2007/08/25
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", mike3, 2007/08/25
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", John Hasler, 2007/08/25
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", mike3, 2007/08/25
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", John Hasler, 2007/08/26
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes",
mike3 <=
Re: GNU "Moral Codes", John Hasler, 2007/08/20
Re: GNU "Moral Codes", David Kastrup, 2007/08/21
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", mike3, 2007/08/24
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", David Kastrup, 2007/08/25
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", mike3, 2007/08/25
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", mike3, 2007/08/26
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/08/26
- Message not available
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", mike3, 2007/08/26
- Re: GNU "Moral Codes", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/08/26