[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU/Linux Naming
From: |
Noah Slater |
Subject: |
Re: GNU/Linux Naming |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Dec 2007 13:01:34 +0000 |
On 07/12/2007, Noah Slater <nslater@bytesexual.org> wrote:
> Well, it depends if your considering them all together:
And then you have glibc - not exactly trivial, and then bash.
On top of that you have things like gcc and GNOME.
--
Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/>
"Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Brian, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming,
Noah Slater <=
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Brian, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Brian, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Koh Choon Lin, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/07