[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Attorney fees
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Attorney fees |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:31:17 +0200 |
Tim Smith wrote:
[...]
> Assume P sues D for copyright violation, over software that P makes
> available under a free software license. What could P ask for in
> monetary damages?
Copyright violation just can't seriously come into play regarding
software available under a "free" software license. The license scope is
unlimited. And even if you effectively terminate the license ("automatic
termination" won't fly) there's nothing preventing D from becoming a
licensee party once again (and again, and again, ...) at the moment of
effective termination of the previous transaction (the license is
offered to the general public).
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Attorney fees, (continued)
- Re: Attorney fees, David Kastrup, 2008/07/11
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/11
- Re: Attorney fees, David Kastrup, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, Tim Smith, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, David Kastrup, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, Tim Smith, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, David Kastrup, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, John Hasler, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, Tim Smith, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/12
- Re: Attorney fees,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/13