[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Attorney fees
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Attorney fees |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:20:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
As if that matters. You're being an utter idiot, Hyman. The busybox
source code was available on Actiontec's web site before the complaint
against Verizon was filed.
Perhaps the plaintiffs had a change of heart after they
filed, then. Or perhaps Actiontec enhanced its support.
The page <http://opensource.actiontec.com/> has source
for a variety of their products.
In any case, my question stands. Do you know of an
instance where the SFLC has dropped a case where
afterwards the source code of the GPL-licensed software
remains unavailable? From the vendor, that is, not from
the original creators?
- Re: Attorney fees, (continued)
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/16
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/16
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/16
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/16
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/17
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/17
- Re: Attorney fees, David Kastrup, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/11
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/13
Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/11