[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Attorney fees
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Attorney fees |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:18:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Why don't you quote ratio decidendi of some case where defendant
> lost on option b?
Do you know of instances where after the SFLC dismissed a case,
the source code of the GPLed software in question was not made
available? If the software was always made available, then the
defendants either believe the GPL is valid or believe that a
court would believe that the GPL is valid or believe that it's
no large burden to make the source available regardless. In any
of these alternatives, the GPL wins.
Motivation for obeying the license doesn't matter. Obeying the
license does.
- Re: Attorney fees, (continued)
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, John Hasler, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/14
- Re: Attorney fees, David Kastrup, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Attorney fees, rjack, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Hyman Rosen, 2008/07/15
- Re: Attorney fees, Alexander Terekhov, 2008/07/15