[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:23:48 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.7.0 |
"amicus_curious" <ACDC@sti.net> writes:
>That seems like the start of a cute trick. If I make a copy from a
>legitimate source, then it is a legitimate copy that I can give away. I
>cannot copy it, but I can give it away. So if I make a million copies
>directly from the legitimate source, I have a million legitimate copies that
>I can dispose of any way that I please, either give them away or sell them
>if I can. The GPL does not restrict that.
An interesting argument that has been made before in these newsgroups.
But not one that anybody ever pleaded as a defense in an actual lawsuit
so far as I can tell.
--
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", (continued)
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/02
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/02
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!",
Rahul Dhesi <=
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", David Kastrup, 2009/02/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", none of your buisiness, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/04