|
From: | Matt |
Subject: | Re: Microsoft EULA never tested in court .. |
Date: | Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:37:13 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) |
Roy Schestowitz wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ____/ Doug Mentohl on Wednesday 11 March 2009 15:37 : \____'By using the software, you accept these terms .. You can recover from Microsoft and its suppliers only direct damages up to the amount you paid for the software' 'This limitation applies to .. claims for breach of contract, breach of warranty, guarantee or condition, strict liability, negligence, or other tort to the extent permitted by applicable law' 'The first user of the software may reassign the license to another device one time' 'The first user of the software may make a one time transfer of the software, and this agreement, directly to a third party'http://download.microsoft.com/documents/useterms/Windows%20Vista_Ultimate_English_36d0fe99-75e4-4875-8153-889cf5105718.pdf This might also be unconstitutional in the US. As for the UK:
Which part of the EULA might be against which part of the Constitution?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |