[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tom Tom and Microsofts Linux patent lock-down ..
From: |
Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: |
Re: Tom Tom and Microsofts Linux patent lock-down .. |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Apr 2009 22:08:34 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
nn/6.7.0 |
Having essentially claimed that GPL contains illegal terms, Rjack is
unable to specify how.
Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
>>> 1) The licensing fees in the GPL are price fixed a no charge to
>>> all third parties.
>>
>> Are we talking antitrust here?
>Uh... WTF are you talking about?
I was trying very hard to figure out in what way anything in the GPL is
illegal. Antitrust was the only thing I could think of, since you
mentioned something that sounded like price-fixing. If that's not it,
then I fail to see what in the GPL you have pointed out as illegal.
--
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/
- Re: Tom Tom and Microsofts Linux patent lock-down .., Rahul Dhesi, 2009/04/04
- Re: Tom Tom and Microsofts Linux patent lock-down .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/11
- can't charge for GPL software .., Doug Mentohl, 2009/04/11
- Re: can't charge for GPL software .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/11
- Re: can't charge for GPL software .., Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/04/11
- Re: can't charge for GPL software .., Doctor Smith, 2009/04/12
- Re: can't charge for GPL software .., Hadron, 2009/04/12
- Re: can't charge for GPL software .., Doctor Smith, 2009/04/12