[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL traitor !
From: |
Joerg Schilling |
Subject: |
Re: GPL traitor ! |
Date: |
15 May 2009 21:04:10 GMT |
In article <1JkPl.47575$5N7.35555@newsfe09.iad>,
Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote:
>> The idea that there is a difference comes from the incorrect
> > assumption that you need to put a binary compiled from GPL
> > sources under GPL too.
>
>No, this is a correct assumption. A binary compiled from GPLed
>source has the same copyright as the source - it is the same
>program, because there is a single copyright in a computer program
>for both the source and binary.
You are wrong: a binary is just a container object that contains
translated versions from different works.
--
EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
- Re: GPL traitor !, (continued)
- Re: GPL traitor !, David Kastrup, 2009/05/15
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/05/14
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/14
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/14
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/14
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/15
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/15
- Re: GPL traitor !,
Joerg Schilling <=
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/15
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/16
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, David Kastrup, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20