[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:18:02 +0200 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > So linking together and shipping the whole conglomerate doesn't mean
> > "accompany" to you?
>
> Correct.
>
> I assume that the "accompany" clause was meant to prevent some
> stratagem ...
Go to clinic and explain to doctor all your assumed stratagems in the
GPL context.
The doctor might help.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_telephone_number
Hth, Hyman.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation, Florian Weimer, 2009/07/30
- Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation, Hyman Rosen, 2009/07/30
- Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/07/31
- Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation, Hyman Rosen, 2009/07/31
- Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/07/31
- Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation, Hyman Rosen, 2009/07/31
- Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation, Hyman Rosen, 2009/07/31
- Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/07/31
- Re: Microsoft's Linux Kernel Code Drop Result of GPL Violation, Rjack, 2009/07/31