[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SFLC is SOL
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: SFLC is SOL |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:08:21 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> RJack wrote:
>>
>> RJack wrote:
>>
>> PACER:
>> SFLC just voluntarily dismissed GCI Technologies Corp.
>
> Uh, where is the SFLC's fucking press release triumphing yet another GPL
> 'settlement victory'?
>
> In the meantime
>
> http://www.cortex-pro.com/hdc_3000.php?t=3
>
> is still in breach.
It would be rather unusual for a settlement not to entail reasonable
deadlines for enacting the settlement.
There is no doubt you'll act hysterical in the mean time, but that is
not really something that the involved parties can take into account
when settling.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: SFLC is SOL, (continued)
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: SFLC is SOL, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
Re: SFLC is SOL, Rex Ballard, 2010/05/04