|
From: | RJack |
Subject: | Re: SFLC stipulated dismissal of Comtrend without any settlement |
Date: | Tue, 04 May 2010 16:13:31 -0000 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) |
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:David Kastrup wrote: [... Pee Jays therom ...]a covered work, you indicate your acceptance of this License to doWhat part of YOU INDICATE ACCEPTANCE don't you understand retard dak? ACCEPTANCE is a contract thing, idiot.
Just because the GPL states something "indicates acceptance" does not make it so since the recipient of software may choose not even to read the license.
The GPL license to many is like the written word of God. You should accept it on faith alone. You vile Heretic.
Without an explicit signing, no contract is established. However, for the _sake_ of the redistributing party, acceptance is _assumed_, because otherwise we are talking not about a breach of conditions, but a criminal act:
Sincerely, RJack :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |