[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:03:39 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 4/20/2010 4:55 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
"Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract
[1] Elements and Case Citations
(1) Defendant and a third-party entered a valid contract;
(2) Plaintiff is not a party to the contract;
(3) The parties to the contract intended that the contract primarily
or directly benefit plaintiff or a class of parties of which plaintiff
is a member;
(4) The contract is breached;
(5) Plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the breach.
Why are you describing this? In the U.S., there have been
no such suits with respect to the GPL or other open licenses.
The GPL itself is not such a license, but even if it were,
the only lawsuits have been brought by rights holders.
- [For Hyman The Retard] Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/05/04
- Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida, RJack, 2010/05/04
- Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida, Hyman Rosen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract, in Florida, David Kastrup, 2010/05/04