|
From: | RJack |
Subject: | Re: Significance of the GP licence. |
Date: | Wed, 05 May 2010 14:14:46 -0400 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 5/5/2010 10:18 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:the case was about alleged contract breachIt doesn't matter what the case was about. Your fellow crank asked for links to "US federal judges who *do not* believe the terms of the GPL can be ignored", and I provided a link to a US judge who shows in her order that she does not believe that the terms of the GPL can be ignored.
"With respect to the General Public License ("GPL"), MYSQL has not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm. . . but the matter is one of fair dispute." Even Glenn Beck couldn't spin this to mean an affirmation of the validity of GPL terms. ROFL.
Of course you and your fellow cranks will disregard evidence which contradicts your cherished but incorrect beliefs even when this evidence is exactly what you asked for. That's what makes you cranks after all.
ROFL. This, from a GNUtian moron who claims a copyright license is not a contract. Sincerely, RJack :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |