[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A purely GNU system?
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: A purely GNU system? |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Nov 2019 16:38:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 08:33:13AM -0500, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> A purley GNU system includes, by defintion, non-GNU packages -- see
> the GNU manifesto. This again is a misunderstanding as to what the
> GNU system and the GNU project are.
I am not sure whether you have read the text beyond the subject line.
My question was this:
I am wondering how functional a system is that contains only GNU packages?
It was just out of curiosity, and not of major importance. At the same time,
it measures the "influence" of the GNU project on the GNU system. For
instance, if all GNU packages were replaced by other software, the GNU
project would be reduced to an agency providing a label (or maybe not even
that).
Andreas
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, (continued)
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Dmitry Alexandrov, 2019/11/07
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/11/07
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/09
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- A purely GNU system? (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system? (Was: A GNU “social contract”?), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Florian Weimer, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Joel Sherrill, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A purely GNU system?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/11/11
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/09
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/09
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2019/11/13
Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Andreas Enge, 2019/11/01