gnue-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnue-dev] Appserver: Object Definition vs. Meta(Class)Object


From: Jens Müller
Subject: Re: [Gnue-dev] Appserver: Object Definition vs. Meta(Class)Object
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 17:04:15 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, i386-debian-linux)

Jan Ischebeck <address@hidden> writes:

> My opinion is to move the class handling code into a "geasMetaObject"
> instead of splitting it into class<->instance handling code and 
> class definition storage code. By moving it into one class it would
> be easy to add new features just by inheritance. f.e. by a
> "geasSupportInheritanceMetaObject" which is just a child of "geasMetaObject"
> parts.

Hm ...

Why do we need a special class that supports inheritance? If we put
inheritance into appserver, than it doesn't do any harm to have it in
all objects?

Anyway ...

I wanted to store the methods in GEOR, and then GEMA could read and
use them.

> BTW. It would be good to change the Name "Object Repository", which I
> think is a bit misleading.  I would suggest to name this part "Class
> Repository" or "Object Definition Repository". 
> something


Full ACK.
-- 
Please don't CC me on replies!



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]