[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnue-dev] Appserver: Object Definition vs. Meta(Class)Object
From: |
Jens Müller |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnue-dev] Appserver: Object Definition vs. Meta(Class)Object |
Date: |
Sun, 19 May 2002 17:04:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, i386-debian-linux) |
Jan Ischebeck <address@hidden> writes:
> My opinion is to move the class handling code into a "geasMetaObject"
> instead of splitting it into class<->instance handling code and
> class definition storage code. By moving it into one class it would
> be easy to add new features just by inheritance. f.e. by a
> "geasSupportInheritanceMetaObject" which is just a child of "geasMetaObject"
> parts.
Hm ...
Why do we need a special class that supports inheritance? If we put
inheritance into appserver, than it doesn't do any harm to have it in
all objects?
Anyway ...
I wanted to store the methods in GEOR, and then GEMA could read and
use them.
> BTW. It would be good to change the Name "Object Repository", which I
> think is a bit misleading. I would suggest to name this part "Class
> Repository" or "Object Definition Repository".
> something
Full ACK.
--
Please don't CC me on replies!