Let me just say this: using a RAD tool like Glade is just the only
logical thing, it is 1000% more productive for UX development then
doing
the building of Gtk objects by hand. So for the sake of sanity,
please
use *some* RAD tool. Besides, AFAIK GtkBuilder isn't deprecated, just
Glade itself is being rewritten/replaced. We used Glade for quite a
while despite it being WIP/in beta, with GNOME's reluctance to
declare
something stable I'm not sure a WIP RAD tool is inherently a bad
idea.
But I *am* sure that doing gtk_box_add() by hand is the road to
insanity. So I would very strongly recommend using Cambalance ---
and
to use the opportunity to clean up the GUIs ;-).
On 2/27/24 20:51, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
I think our use of glade is historical.
It just made sense to somebody (not me, my guess is Christian).
I personally have no issue with moving away from glade as RAD tool
as I
find it very cumbersome myself.
Note, however, that it will also mean writing a lot of code that is
currently hidden behind those glade XML files.
OTOH moving to a WIP RAD tool is also not such a smart idea, maybe.
But
that depends on the maturity of cambalanche, which I cannot judge
myself
right now as I have never tried it.
BR
On 27.02.24 20:19, Gotam Gorabh wrote:
Hello Martin,
Note that migration from gtk3 to gtk4 especially for gnunet-
gtk is
not
trivial: We use libglade, which does not exist for gtk4.
We will need to decide if we want to migrate to something
like
https://blogs.gnome.org/xjuan/2023/09/28/cambalache-0-16-0-released/
<
https://blogs.gnome.org/xjuan/2023/09/28/cambalache-0-16-0-release
d/> or
something different entirely.
Why can't we use the proper GObject concept like other gnome
application does? E.g. GNOME Settings, Nautilus, etc. which can
handle the properties, and signals in a structured way.
Thanks. Regards
Gotam Gorabh
OpenPGP_signature