gnustandards maintain.texi

[Karl Berry]

CVSROOT:        /sources/gnustandards
Module name:    gnustandards
Changes by:     Karl Berry <karl>       12/05/17 23:07:50

Modified files:
        .              : maintain.texi 

Log message:
        this is Texinfo, not HTML

CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnustandards/maintain.texi?cvsroot=gnustandards&r1=1.221&r2=1.222

Patches:
Index: maintain.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/gnustandards/gnustandards/maintain.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.221
retrieving revision 1.222
diff -u -b -r1.221 -r1.222
--- maintain.texi       14 May 2012 22:30:01 -0000      1.221
+++ maintain.texi       17 May 2012 23:07:50 -0000      1.222
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 @c For double-sided printing, uncomment:
 @c @setchapternewpage odd
 @c This date is automagically updated when you save this file:
address@hidden lastupdate May 14, 2012
address@hidden lastupdate May 17, 2012
 @c %**end of header
 
 @dircategory GNU organization
@@ -985,12 +985,12 @@
 useful functionality, as a ``library'' facility (though the module is
 not always packaged technically as a library).
 
-Make sure the license of the module is compatible with current <em>and
-future</em> GPL versions.  ``GNU GPL version 3 or later'' is good, and
+Make sure the license of the module is compatible with current @emph{and
+future} GPL versions.  ``GNU GPL version 3 or later'' is good, and
 so is anything which includes permission for use under those GPL
 versions (including ``GNU GPL version 2 or later'', ``LGPL version
-<em>n</em> or later'', ``LGPL version 2.1'', ``GNU Affero GPL version
-3 or later'').  Lax permissive licenses are ok too, since they are
address@hidden or later'', ``LGPL version 2.1'', ``GNU Affero GPL version 3
+or later'').  Lax permissive licenses are ok too, since they are
 compatible with all GPL versions.
 
 ``GPL version 2 only'' is obviously unacceptable because it is