gnustandards-commit
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

gnustandards ChangeLog standards.texi


From: karl
Subject: gnustandards ChangeLog standards.texi
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 23:59:59 +0000

CVSROOT:        /sources/gnustandards
Module name:    gnustandards
Changes by:     karl <karl>     13/01/01 23:59:59

Modified files:
        .              : ChangeLog standards.texi 

Log message:
        avoid @sc

CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnustandards/ChangeLog?cvsroot=gnustandards&r1=1.173&r2=1.174
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/gnustandards/standards.texi?cvsroot=gnustandards&r1=1.222&r2=1.223

Patches:
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/gnustandards/gnustandards/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.173
retrieving revision 1.174
diff -u -b -r1.173 -r1.174
--- ChangeLog   1 Jan 2013 23:57:55 -0000       1.173
+++ ChangeLog   1 Jan 2013 23:59:59 -0000       1.174
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2013-01-01  Karl Berry  <address@hidden>
+
+       * standards.texi: do not use @sc, for consistency
+       with other manuals.
+
 2013-01-01  Paul Eggert  <address@hidden>
        and Richard Stallman  <address@hidden>
 

Index: standards.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/gnustandards/gnustandards/standards.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.222
retrieving revision 1.223
diff -u -b -r1.222 -r1.223
--- standards.texi      1 Jan 2013 23:57:55 -0000       1.222
+++ standards.texi      1 Jan 2013 23:59:59 -0000       1.223
@@ -339,20 +339,21 @@
 
 @node Compatibility
 @section Compatibility with Other Implementations
address@hidden compatibility with C and @sc{posix} standards
address@hidden @sc{posix} compatibility
address@hidden compatibility with C and POSIX standards
address@hidden C compatibility
address@hidden POSIX compatibility
 
 With occasional exceptions, utility programs and libraries for GNU
 should be upward compatible with those in Berkeley Unix, and upward
 compatible with Standard C if Standard C specifies their
-behavior, and upward compatible with @sc{posix} if @sc{posix} specifies
+behavior, and upward compatible with POSIX if POSIX specifies
 their behavior.
 
 When these standards conflict, it is useful to offer compatibility
 modes for each of them.
 
 @cindex options for compatibility
-Standard C and @sc{posix} prohibit many kinds of extensions.  Feel
+Standard C and POSIX prohibit many kinds of extensions.  Feel
 free to make the extensions anyway, and include a @samp{--ansi},
 @samp{--posix}, or @samp{--compatible} option to turn them off.
 However, if the extension has a significant chance of breaking any real
@@ -360,7 +361,7 @@
 should try to redesign its interface to make it upward compatible.
 
 @cindex @code{POSIXLY_CORRECT}, environment variable
-Many GNU programs suppress extensions that conflict with @sc{posix} if the
+Many GNU programs suppress extensions that conflict with POSIX if the
 environment variable @code{POSIXLY_CORRECT} is defined (even if it is
 defined with a null value).  Please make your program recognize this
 variable if appropriate.
@@ -408,7 +409,7 @@
 
 @node Standard C
 @section Standard C and Pre-Standard C
address@hidden @sc{ansi} C standard
address@hidden ANSI C standard
 
 1989 Standard C is widespread enough now that it is ok to use its
 features in programs.  There is one exception: do not ever use the
@@ -670,10 +671,10 @@
 
 @cindex signal handling
 The preferred signal handling facilities are the BSD variant of
address@hidden, and the @sc{posix} @code{sigaction} function; the
address@hidden, and the POSIX @code{sigaction} function; the
 alternative USG @code{signal} interface is an inferior design.
 
-Nowadays, using the @sc{posix} signal functions may be the easiest way
+Nowadays, using the POSIX signal functions may be the easiest way
 to make a program portable.  If you use @code{signal}, then on GNU/Linux
 systems running GNU libc version 1, you should include
 @file{bsd/signal.h} instead of @file{signal.h}, so as to get BSD
@@ -906,11 +907,11 @@
 @cindex command-line interface
 
 @findex getopt
-It is a good idea to follow the @sc{posix} guidelines for the
+It is a good idea to follow the POSIX guidelines for the
 command-line options of a program.  The easiest way to do this is to use
 @code{getopt} to parse them.  Note that the GNU version of @code{getopt}
 will normally permit options anywhere among the arguments unless the
-special argument @samp{--} is used.  This is not what @sc{posix}
+special argument @samp{--} is used.  This is not what POSIX
 specifies; it is a GNU extension.
 
 @cindex long-named options
@@ -2871,7 +2872,7 @@
 not paramount.
 
 The primary purpose of GNU software is to run on top of the GNU kernel,
-compiled with the GNU C compiler, on various types of @sc{cpu}.  So the
+compiled with the GNU C compiler, on various types of CPU.  So the
 kinds of portability that are absolutely necessary are quite limited.
 But it is important to support Linux-based GNU systems, since they
 are the form of GNU that is popular.
@@ -2893,7 +2894,7 @@
 Avoid using the format of semi-internal data bases (e.g., directories)
 when there is a higher-level alternative (@code{readdir}).
 
address@hidden address@hidden systems, and portability
address@hidden non-POSIX systems, and portability
 As for systems that are not like Unix, such as MSDOS, Windows, VMS, MVS,
 and older Macintosh systems, supporting them is often a lot of work.
 When that is the case, it is better to spend your time adding features
@@ -2922,11 +2923,11 @@
 to move your code into other GNU programs.
 
 @node CPU Portability
address@hidden Portability between @sc{cpu}s
address@hidden Portability between CPUs
 
 @cindex data types, and portability
 @cindex portability, and data types
-Even GNU systems will differ because of differences among @sc{cpu}
+Even GNU systems will differ because of differences among CPU
 types---for example, difference in byte ordering and alignment
 requirements.  It is absolutely essential to handle these differences.
 However, don't make any effort to cater to the possibility that an



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]