[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL
From: |
Daode |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:30:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
s-nail s-nailv13.3-143-gd4c3da7 |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
|> i.e., let me write \*[ITEM] even if that was a macro not a string.
|> (Or has something adorable happened since then.)
|
|I don't understand your (probably sarcastic?) comment. That \*[ITEM]
|can call either a macro or a string is a feature which can be useful
|sometimes.
.de m
tea\c
..
.ds s coffee \\*m
\*m \*s
prints
tea coffee tea
No, not sarcastic, i really didn't know.
.. and can unnoodle, if i'll find my way through it!
It looks as if it was documented first on 2008-09-28;
do i have to change my version check from
if (\n[.x] == 1) .if (\n[.y] < 18) .ab [.] requires GNU (t)roff 1.18
to 1.20 for this to work?
| Werner
Thanks, that is a really great improvement!
--steffen
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Bernd Warken, 2013/01/24
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Colin Watson, 2013/01/24
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, walter harms, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Colin Watson, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Bernd Warken, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Bernd Warken, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Daode, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/01/26
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL,
Daode <=
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2013/01/26
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Daode, 2013/01/26
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/01/26
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Daode, 2013/01/26
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Bernd Warken, 2013/01/25
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/01/26
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Ingo Schwarze, 2013/01/26
- Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, Bernd Warken, 2013/01/26
Re: [Groff] GPL or FDL, James K. Lowden, 2013/01/25