Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs

[James Cloos]

>>>>> "WL" == Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:

WL> Th[e] [/uring] glyph is only contained in the URW fonts.

It would be useful were the \[] construct, if the NFC glyph is
unavailable but the NFD constituents are, to use the same mechanism
as \o'' to construct a fallback for the desired glyph.

Also, I see that preconv converts ů to \[u016F] and ů to u\[u030A],
neither of which fall back to overlaying \u and \ring when needed;
and the sequence fails to work even with a font like U-T.

(Had more to say, but have to run for a few hours....)

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <address@hidden>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6