[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Automake migration proposal
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Automake migration proposal |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:47:32 +0200 (CEST) |
>> Well, your suggestion of splitting the patch into smaller units is
>> the way to go, I reckon. In case it improves legibility, I don't
>> mind if there is a series of commits that don't compile – simply
>> tag them as such in the commit message.
>
> I'm not sure if it would be easy to split the patch, you could not
> really check the intermediate states if you can't compile.
This doesn't matter! The most important thing is to split the patch
into smaller, *logical* chunks that can be easily understood.
> I think the easiest way to review the build system is the compare
> every .am file with the original Makefile.sub.
Well, yes, but it could be helpful to handle, say, the various make
targets in different commits.
Werner
- Re: [Groff] Automake migration proposal, (continued)
Re: [Groff] Automake migration proposal, Ingo Schwarze, 2014/08/11
Re: [Groff] Automake migration proposal, Ingo Schwarze, 2014/08/11