Re: branch master updated: licenses: Export license record.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

zimoun <address@hidden> skribis:

>> Perhaps this suggests we should document it, maybe in the “Coding Style”
>> section?  WDYT?

I was really thinking about this pattern of not always exposing raw
record constructors or record type descriptors.

> I have read the Channel section again. Maybe there in the big Red Warning 
> place.
> Something saying that the API exposes what it necessary to extend
> respecting user freedom (better worded);

I think this particular bit is implied by the current text, no?

> with a footnote mentioning that non exported functions can be reached
> with @@ with a reference to the Guile manual.

Using private bindings is always at the user’s own risks, I’ll never
suggest using @@ to “break the rules”.  :-)

Ludo’.