[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors? |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Sep 2023 00:11:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.10.5; emacs 28.2 |
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
> In the simplest case, it can be as simple as:
>
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u some-package
> [build it, try it, fix if needed]
> $ ./etc/committer.scm
> $ git send-email
>
> Since it's a single patch, there's no jumping through hoops to create
> the original issue, and the auto-configured git will CC teams people
> subscribed to the scope of your change (if there are any).
Sadly the not-so-simple case is much more annoying.
I like an email-based workflow, don’t get me wrong. At the same time
I’m really not a fan of Debbugs. It makes simple things more difficult
than they should be (send a cover letter, wait for your mail to pass the
anti-spam measures, remember that you wanted to send a couple of
patches, etc), and no amount of sugar coating (whether that be a
different frontend like Mumi or a hell of a lot of client-side
scripting) can overcome this inherent clunkiness.
I’m no stranger to clunky or quirky interfaces. I put up with them
because they unlock workflows and features or flexibility that would
otherwise be unattainable. Emacs and Guix are great examples of quirky
interfaces that brim with flexibility. I just think that Debbugs
doesn’t make the cut.
If only we can find a suitable baby sieve, I’d be happy to see the
turbid bathwater drained. If Mumi and Debbugs went down the drain to
reveal a new hassle-free web/email hybrid patch workflow I’d be
ecstatic.
--
Ricardo
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2023/09/05
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, MSavoritias, 2023/09/13
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Vagrant Cascadian, 2023/09/02
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/09/04
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Efraim Flashner, 2023/09/04
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/09/04
- Replacing Mumi+Debbugs?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/09/05
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Csepp, 2023/09/05
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Wilko Meyer, 2023/09/05
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Imran Iqbal, 2023/09/03