guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thank you for using Emacs


From: MSavoritias
Subject: Re: Thank you for using Emacs
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 17:45:38 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0


On 9/18/23 16:10, Peter Polidoro wrote:

MSavoritias <email@msavoritias.me> writes:

I go to the manual to learn package management, https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/guix.html#Package-Management

Apparently i have to either use the terminal or something called emacs. If I follow the guide located here: https://emacs-guix.gitlab.io/website/manual/latest/emacs-guix.html#Installation

It says to install emacs-guix. Okay. So apparently it is an Emacs thing, whatever that means. And when you start Emacs after installing the package, you are going to end up with Emacs in its plain form. Unfamiliar keybindings, no autocomplete, etc. Well thats no to Emacs then. The other thing is the terminal apparently. Horrible, but at least it works.

You make a very good point, being exposed to Emacs for the very first time in this way would be a terrible experience and listing alternative options would be very beneficial.

However, I would just like to say "Thank you!" to everyone here for using Emacs in the manual.

For my entire career in hardware engineering, I have felt like an outcast for using Emacs and being passionate about free software. When everyone else on a team or in a company or organization uses proprietary software only, it is very isolating and career limiting to stay committed to the free software and hardware movements.

So while you may not win any popularity contests by using Emacs in the manual, just know that it is very much appreciated by some of us.

Its not Emacs per se. Its more like vanilla Emacs. I very much like Emacs. The idea of it at least.

What i meant more was:

- Offer an alternative to Emacs.

- Specify a distro like doom Emacs that comes with better defaults.

I would maybe lean towards the second one i here fyi. I agree it would be nice to introduce people to lisp modifiable editors :D

And for guile specifically to offer guile-studio instead of plain Emacs.


MSavoritias




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]