[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Git-LFS or Git Annex?
From: |
Troy Figiel |
Subject: |
Re: Git-LFS or Git Annex? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:32:12 +0100 |
Hi all,
On 2024-01-24 19:41, pukkamustard wrote:
> I've used Git Annex for managing many large files (~100s of GiBs) and it
> worked. However, I found Git Annex to be quite complex and to do things
> automatically without me fully realizing.
>
I can mirror this sentiment. As far as my experience with git-annex
goes, it is a very flexible tool, but difficult to grok.
Although both are FOSS, only git-annex is mostly copyleft with the
(A)GPL3+. git-lfs I believe is copyrighted mainly by two large companies
(GitHub and Atlassian) under a non-copyleft license. Something to keep
in mind at least.
Best wishes,
Troy
OpenPGP_0xC67C9181B3893FB0.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Git-LFS or Git Annex?, Philip McGrath, 2024/01/26
Re: Git-LFS or Git Annex?, Efraim Flashner, 2024/01/28