[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:06:49 +0100 |
Hi Clément,
On jeu., 15 févr. 2024 at 12:45, Clément Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org> wrote:
>>> 'b4 shazam' is probably the most trouble-free way to apply patches;
>>
>> I agree*!
>
> I don't agree (both Gwene + Gnus or Emacs Debbugs work perfectly too and
> allow to apply a range of n patches at once) but I don't think there is
> a need for competition here, it's good that we have several tools.
Yes for sure it is good to have several tools. And the ones you like. :-)
No one is advocating to make ’b4 shazam’ THE only one tool.
Instead, I agree with Maxim that exposing Message-ID and relying on ’b4
shazam’ is the most trouble-free and config-less way to apply patches.
>> What appears to me “difficult” is that most of the
>> tools as Email client are poorly supporting Message-ID.
>>
>> For instance, debbugs.el (Gnus). To my knowledge, there is not easy way
>> to get the Message-ID when reading an article (bug/patch) from Debbugs.
>> There is other means for applying patches. But still each time appears
>> to me weird. :-)
>
> It's
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (with-current-buffer gnus-original-article-buffer
> (message-fetch-field "Message-ID"))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
[...]
> May I add too, that you can add "Message-ID" in gnus-visible-headers.
And what about Summary buffer?
Well, it makes my point, no? :-)
For sure the Message-ID is there and for sure it is possible to extract
it. However, it appears to me weird that it is not built-in. I mean
Message-ID is one of the heart of Emails, and Debbugs is just Emails,
but debbugs.el does not provide a built-in access to it.
Cheers,
simon
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, (continued)
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Kyle Meyer, 2024/02/07
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Maxim Cournoyer, 2024/02/11
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Simon Tournier, 2024/02/15
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Josselin Poiret, 2024/02/15
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Simon Tournier, 2024/02/15
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Clément Lassieur, 2024/02/15
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Clément Lassieur, 2024/02/15
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Felix Lechner, 2024/02/15
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Simon Tournier, 2024/02/15
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Maxim Cournoyer, 2024/02/16
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion,
Simon Tournier <=
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Clément Lassieur, 2024/02/15
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Simon Tournier, 2024/02/15
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Clément Lassieur, 2024/02/15
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Maxim Cournoyer, 2024/02/16
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Suhail, 2024/02/06
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Clément Lassieur, 2024/02/16
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Suhail, 2024/02/17