guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#27657] Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: graphviz: Update to 2.40.1.)


From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Subject: [bug#27657] Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: graphviz: Update to 2.40.1.)
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:02:09 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0

Arun,

On 11/07/17 23:34, Arun Isaac wrote:
> Both appear to be the same tarball. I don't know why they have two
> copies on the server. Should we change the source URL of our package?

In general, dual-directory schemes like this — anything involving
‘current’ vs. ‘archive’ — often suggest that the project intends to
periodically prune the former.

For example, they might keep only the latest release of a series and
move the rest to an ‘archive’ directory. Therefore, it's common to use
the latter directly, or hedge our bets by trying both.
The ‘sudo’ package is a good example of this.

In this case, as you've no doubt already noticed, both directories are
identical. I'd say: before changing anything, ask upstream why they do
this and which URI we should prefer.

Kind regards,

T G-R

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]