[bug#30150] github-com-umayr-badass (or short: badass)

[Leo Famulari]

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 08:17:01AM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> Leo Famulari transcribed 2.1K bytes:
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:48:42PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > > From 23242a1b6b96fed99f2dea3567b95ef35e2ebe5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: ng0 <address@hidden>
> > > Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:42:55 +0000
> > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add github-com-umayr-badass.
> > > 
> > > * gnu/packages/games.scm (github-com-umayr-badass): New variable.
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > +(define-public go-github-com-umayr-badass
> > > +  (let ((commit "3c3cd669b4fc8f73a102e3702788f7b28dc47dbb")
> > > +        (revision "0"))
> > > +  (package
> > > +    (name "go-github-com-umayr-badass")
> > 
> > The name in the commit message is missing the 'go-' prefix.
> 
> Okay, I will send a correction once you reply to the question
> below.
> 
> > 
> > > +    (synopsis "Hacking contribution graphs in git")
> > > +    (description
> > > +     "Badass generates false commits for a range of dates, essentially
> > > +hacking the gamification of contribution graphs on platforms such as
> > > +Github or Gitlab.")
> > 
> > Hahaha, LGTM overall.
> > 
> > Only question is, should we call the package "badass"? I think the
> > long Go library names are only necessary for libraries, while we can
> > use a shorter name for an executable program like this one.
> 
> Right, I did not consider this. Yes, although badass is quiet generic
> and not a very unique namespace? I'm not sure.

That's true. Do we want to use the name 'badass' for this package? I
didn't find any 'badass' packages in Debian. I think it's okay, unless
there is some other 'badass' software that is very prominent and that we
might package someday. But I can't think of any.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature