[bug#65000] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-next: Update to 29.1.

[Tobias Geerinckx-Rice]

On 2023-08-01 22:27, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Welp, given that this is a release, it's no longer, "emacs-next", isn't
> it?

Oh?  To me, "-next" does not imply ‘not a release’.

It can mean all sorts of fun things, like ‘known to be broken if you 
hold it wrong’, ‘simply not as tested as the primary package’, or even 
‘I didn't wanna wait for a whole proper "emacs" integration cycle to get 
this upstream ;-)’.

Yeah, that's the one.

> Quite a number of prerequisites ;)

Local branches are for gits!  Constantly rebasing keeps the fingers 
strong.

Buff regards,

T G-R

Sent from a Web browser.  Excuse or enjoy my brevity.