[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#64109: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: dpf-plugins: Update to 1.7.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#64109: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: dpf-plugins: Update to 1.7. |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2023 23:05:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
I applied the first patch (upgrade).
Sughosha <Sughosha@proton.me> skribis:
>>From a74eb4c58d45d30450ba8b70e4faddee52b37f13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id:
> <a74eb4c58d45d30450ba8b70e4faddee52b37f13.1686926462.git.sughosha@proton.me>
> In-Reply-To:
> <23da89c3cbf2358ac70d387ebd714abe03b6758e.1686926462.git.sughosha@proton.me>
> References:
> <23da89c3cbf2358ac70d387ebd714abe03b6758e.1686926462.git.sughosha@proton.me>
> From: Sughosha <sughosha@proton.me>
> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 16:39:21 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: dpf-plugins: Add native-search-paths.
>
> * gnu/packages/music.scm (dpf-plugins): Add native-search-paths.
[...]
> @@ -6372,6 +6372,25 @@ (define-public dpf-plugins
> liblo ; for dssi plugins
> jack-1 ; for standalone applications
> mesa))
> + (native-search-paths
> + (list (search-path-specification
> + (variable "CLAP_PATH")
> + (files '("lib/clap")))
> + (search-path-specification
> + (variable "DSSI_PATH")
> + (files '("lib/dssi")))
> + (search-path-specification
> + (variable "LADSPA_PATH")
> + (files '("lib/ladspa")))
> + (search-path-specification
> + (variable "LV2_PATH")
> + (files '("lib/lv2")))
> + (search-path-specification
> + (variable "VST2_PATH")
> + (files '("lib/vst")))
> + (search-path-specification
> + (variable "VST3_PATH")
> + (files '("lib/vst3")))))
At first sight I think this is incorrect: search paths should be
specified in the patch that honors them. See
<https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Search-Paths.html>.
Am I right that ‘dnf-plugins’ does not honor them, but instead ‘ladspa’
(maybe?) does? (I’m no expert here.)
Ludo’.
- bug#64109: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: dpf-plugins: Update to 1.7.,
Ludovic Courtès <=