[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#65849] [PATCH v5] gnu: xpra: Update to 5.0.2
From: |
Christopher Baines |
Subject: |
[bug#65849] [PATCH v5] gnu: xpra: Update to 5.0.2 |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:50:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.10.5; emacs 28.2 |
Andy Tai <atai@atai.org> writes:
> From: Andy Tai <ltai@roku.com>
>
> * gnu/packages/xorg.scm (xpra): Update to 5.0.2.
> [inputs]: Add cups.
...
> * gnu/packages/patches/xpra-5.0-install_libs.patch: New file.
> * gnu/packages/patches/xpra-5.0-systemd-run.patch: New file.
> * gnu/packages/patches/xpra-4.2-install_libs.patch: Removed.
> * gnu/packages/patches/xpra-4.2-systemd-run.patch: Removed.
This doesn't really capture what's going on here. The patches are being
updated for the new version, right?
We also seem to be loosing the descriptions of the patches that appear
at the tops of the file. I think guix lint should be reporting this.
Could you add the comments back, and ideally link to where these patches
have been sent upstream (or say why that isn't appropriate)?
Thanks,
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [bug#65849] [PATCH] gnu: xpra: Update to 5.0.1, Andy Tai, 2023/09/09
- [bug#65849] [PATCH v2] gnu: xpra: Update to 5.0.1, Andy Tai, 2023/09/10
- [bug#65849] [PATCH v3] gnu: xpra: Update to 5.0.2, Andy Tai, 2023/09/19
- [bug#65849] [PATCH v4] gnu: xpra: Update to 5.0.2, Andy Tai, 2023/09/20
- [bug#65849] [PATCH v5] gnu: xpra: Update to 5.0.2, Andy Tai, 2023/09/21
- [bug#65849] [PATCH v5] gnu: xpra: Update to 5.0.2,
Christopher Baines <=
- [bug#65849] [PATCH v6] gnu: xpra: Update to 5.0.2, Andy Tai, 2023/09/27