[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#69392] [PATCH v3 3/3] news: Add entry for changes in GNOME 44 and i
From: |
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) |
Subject: |
[bug#69392] [PATCH v3 3/3] news: Add entry for changes in GNOME 44 and its desktop service. |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:21:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi all. Good to see so many translations, and so much development for
Guix!
@Vivien:
> Suggested fr: "Le service @code{gnome-desktop-service-type} sépare
> maintenant les paquets @code{shell}, @code{utilities} et @code{extra-
Perhaps “les champs” as in English, instead of “les paquets”.
@Liliana:
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
> * etc/teams.scm: Add entry.
teams?
> +unter andrem zwischen den Feldern shell, utilities, und extra-packages und
> +bringt so etwas mehr Struktur in die Konfiguration.
In German, there shouldn’t be an Oxford comma, instead: utilities und
extra-packages (without comma).
Other than that, even though I would have written “unter anderem”, I do
approve of the “unter andrem”. Wiktionary says it’s OK. :)
> +Mit dem Update zu GNOME 44 wurden einige Erweiterungen als obsolet deklariert
> +und andere entfernt. Falls ein Paket, dessen Name mit
> +@code{gnome-shell-extension-} beginnt zu einem Fehler während Ihrer
Paariges Komma fehlt: “beginnt, zu einem Fehler”
> +Update-Routine führt, entfernen Sie es von ihrem Profil.")))
von Ihrem Profil
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> writes:
>> Since it is Texinfo, maybe you could use @dots{} instead of “...”.
> Not sure if that works recursively.
>> été dépréciées et d’autres supprimées. Si un paquet nommé
>> @code{gnome-shell-extension-@dots{}} émet une erreur quand vous
>> effectuez la mise à jour, vous devriez l’enlever de votre profil."
> Have you checked how that renders?
There is precedent in another news entry on Childhurds:
When you do this, @command{guix system} generates
a @file{/etc/guix/machines.scm} file by concatenating the @code{(build-machine
@dots{})} expressions you specified.
Regards,
Florian
[bug#69392] [PATCH v4 0/3] Updated news with your suggestions, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2024/02/27