[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#69424] (No Subject)
|
From: |
Hilton Chain |
|
Subject: |
[bug#69424] (No Subject) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:16:36 +0800 |
Hi!
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 20:19:41 +0800,
Jiwei YANG via Guix-patches via wrote:
>
> Thanks! For font-google-noto-sans-cjk and font-google-noto-serif-cjk, will it
> be good to use "Super OTC" fonts? In my case, LibreOffice (flatpak version)
> was unable to recognize "Super OTC" edition but it is fixed now. There may
> still be some compatibility problems that I have not noticed.
Since in this series I'm switching to variable fonts, the (static) "Super OTC"
format has no advantage in either feature or size.
Thanks
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v2 4/5] gnu: font-google-noto-sans-cjk: Switch to variable fonts., (continued)
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v2 4/5] gnu: font-google-noto-sans-cjk: Switch to variable fonts., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/27
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v2 3/5] gnu: font-google-noto-emoji: Update to 2.042., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/27
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v2 5/5] gnu: font-google-noto-serif-cjk: Update to 2.002., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/27
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v3 0/5] Update Noto fonts and switch them to variable fonts (77% size reduced)., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v3 4/5] gnu: font-google-noto-sans-cjk: Switch to variable fonts., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v3 5/5] gnu: font-google-noto-serif-cjk: Update to 2.002., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v3 3/5] gnu: font-google-noto-emoji: Update to 2.042., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v3 1/5] gnu: font-google-noto: Update to 24.2.1., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] [PATCH v3 2/5] gnu: font-google-noto: Prefer variable fonts and split outputs., Hilton Chain, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] (No Subject), Jiwei YANG, 2024/02/28
- [bug#69424] (No Subject),
Hilton Chain <=