guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#69502] [PATCH] gnu: sdl2: Update to 2.30.0.


From: John Kehayias
Subject: [bug#69502] [PATCH] gnu: sdl2: Update to 2.30.0.
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 05:46:51 +0000

Hi dan,

On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 05:06 PM, dan wrote:

> * gnu/packages/sdl.scm (sdl2): Update to 2.30.0.
>
> Change-Id: I6c029cc5732e286816550871e519d79b1a13e70f
> ---
>  gnu/packages/sdl.scm | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/sdl.scm b/gnu/packages/sdl.scm
> index 3a4aafcaa7..2bb41b9ca2 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/sdl.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/sdl.scm
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>  ;;; Copyright © 2020 Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com>
>  ;;; Copyright © 2022 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
>  ;;; Copyright © 2023 Evgeny Pisemsky <evgeny@pisemsky.com>
> -;;; Copyright © 2023 dan <i@dan.games>
> +;;; Copyright © 2023, 2024 dan <i@dan.games>
>  ;;;
>  ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
>  ;;;
> @@ -118,30 +118,32 @@ (define-public sdl2
>    (package
>      (inherit sdl)
>      (name "sdl2")
> -    (version "2.28.5")
> -    (source (origin
> -              (method url-fetch)
> -              (uri
> -               (string-append "https://libsdl.org/release/SDL2-";
> -                              version ".tar.gz"))
> -              (sha256
> -               (base32
> -                "1r36cspzv6h8abiqbbkrgm17g975p9wiziir2xabj3721dyv6b1k"))))
> +    (version "2.30.0")
> +    (source
> +     (origin
> +       (method url-fetch)
> +       (uri (string-append "https://libsdl.org/release/SDL2-"; version
> +                           ".tar.gz"))
> +       (sha256
> +        (base32 "1c27ci93j4kgxdmpflaww8kwnz58b1chyp1i34almyp0away9qin"))))

I'm guessing the slight style change is from guix style, which can be
fine (here seems okay to me and more typical), but

>      (arguments
>       (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments sdl)
>         ((#:configure-flags flags)
>          #~(append '("--disable-wayland-shared" "--enable-video-kmsdrm"
>                      "--disable-kmsdrm-shared")
>                    #$flags))
> -       ((#:make-flags flags ''())
> +       ((#:make-flags flags
> +         ''())
>          #~(cons*
>             ;; SDL dlopens libudev and libvulkan, so make sure they are in
>             ;; rpath. This overrides the LDFLAG set in sdl’s configure-flags,
>             ;; which isn’t necessary as sdl2 includes Mesa by default.
>             (string-append "LDFLAGS=-Wl,-rpath,"
> -                          #$(this-package-input "eudev") "/lib"
> +                          #$(this-package-input "eudev")
> +                          "/lib"
>                            ",-rpath,"
> -                          #$(this-package-input "vulkan-loader") "/lib")
> +                          #$(this-package-input "vulkan-loader")
> +                          "/lib")
>             #$flags))))
>      (inputs
>       ;; SDL2 needs to be built with ibus support otherwise some systems
> @@ -150,11 +152,11 @@ (define-public sdl2
>       ;; For more information, see: https://dev.solus-project.com/T1721
>       (modify-inputs (package-inputs sdl)
>         (append dbus
> -               eudev                    ;for discovering input devices
> +               eudev ;for discovering input devices
>                 glib
>                 ibus-minimal
>                 libxkbcommon
> -               libxcursor               ;enables X11 cursor support
> +               libxcursor ;enables X11 cursor support
>                 vulkan-loader
>                 wayland
>                 wayland-protocols)))
>
> base-commit: 4a0549be52f3f46fbce61342d8de30f7b83130c5

these last changes all seem superfluous to me, not really improving the
style. I don't think guix lint had any issues before, so I think we can
drop these more random changes after the source change to reduce noise
for this commit. Otherwise LGTM and I can take it on mesa-updates soon
(next week when I'm back).

Thanks!
John






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]