[bug#70020] [PATCH 1/1] * gnu: Add debian-devscripts.

[Jelle Licht]

Hi Steve,

Steve George <steve@futurile.net> writes:

> * gnu/packages/debian.scm (debian-devscripts): New variable.
>
> Change-Id: Iff64afdb1f730f3d941617bc428a57d09c0381b2
> ---
>  gnu/packages/debian.scm | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/debian.scm b/gnu/packages/debian.scm
> index 1715b963a93..ecec816d872 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/debian.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/debian.scm
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ (define-module (gnu packages debian)
>    #:use-module (guix packages)
>    #:use-module (guix build-system copy)
>    #:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
> +  #:use-module (guix build-system perl)
>    #:use-module (guix build-system trivial)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages autotools)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages backup)
> @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ (define-module (gnu packages debian)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages bash)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages compression)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages crypto)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages databases)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages dbm)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages gettext)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages gnupg)
> @@ -43,6 +45,8 @@ (define-module (gnu packages debian)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages ncurses)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages perl)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages python)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages web)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages wget)
>    #:use-module (srfi srfi-26))
>  
> @@ -211,6 +215,68 @@ (define-public ubuntu-keyring
>      (license (list license:public-domain ; the keys
>                     license:gpl2+)))) ; see debian/copyright
>  
> +(define-public debian-devscripts
> +  (package
> +    (name "debian-devscripts")
> +    (version "2.23.7")
> +    (source
> +      (origin
> +        (method git-fetch)
> +        (uri (git-reference
> +              (url "https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts.git";)
> +              (commit (string-append "v" version))))
> +        (file-name (git-file-name name version))
> +       (sha256
> +         (base32
> +           "031467rclglk1hdx8z2vzx5z88vpy0sk73qi8ni0sai3jx62ji75"))))
> +    (build-system gnu-build-system)
> +    (arguments
> +      (list
> +        #:tests? #f ; tests assume various Debian specific capabilities
> +        #:phases
> +            #~(modify-phases %standard-phases
> +                (delete 'configure)
> +                (delete 'build)
> +                (replace 'install
> +                  (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> +                    (let ((bin (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "out") 
> "/bin"))
> +                          (devscripts-lib (string-append (assoc-ref outputs 
> "out")
> +                                                
> "/lib/perl5/site_perl/Devscripts")))

> +                      (with-directory-excursion "scripts"
> +                        (substitute* "bts.pl" (("/bin/bash") (which "bash")))
> +                        (substitute* "bts.pl" (("/bin/rm") (which "rm")))
> +                        (substitute* "bts.pl" (("/bin/cat") (which "cat")))
> +                        ;; Avoid having to provide Debian's sensible-browser 
> package
> +                        (substitute* "bts.pl"
> +                            (("my \\$browser;") "my $browser = 
> $ENV{'BROWSER'};"))
> +                        (substitute* "bts.pl"
> +                            (("'sensible-browser',") "$browser,"))
This could be separate phase, such as:
(add-after 'unpack 'patch-programs ...)


> +                        (rename-file "bts.pl" "bts")
> +                        (install-file "bts" bin))

It seems this "only" installs bts, compared to the (huge) list of helper
scripts I see listed in the repo README.

IMHO not a blocker, but it should probably be reflected in either a
comment or the package synopsis, name or description. Perhaps an
acceptable compromise is to spin this off into just a 'bts' package?


> +                      (with-directory-excursion "lib/Devscripts/"
> +                        (for-each (lambda (f) (install-file f 
> devscripts-lib))
> +                                  (find-files "./")))))))))

This seems to not install any bash completions or manpages.  IWBN to
also install those, of at least make a comment w.r.t. them not being
installed at this time.


> +    (native-inputs (list perl perl-libwww perl-uri pkg-config python))
> +    (propagated-inputs
> +      (list dpkg
> +            perl-authen-sasl
> +            perl-db-file
> +            perl-encode
> +            perl-file-homedir
> +            perl-file-which
> +            perl-ipc-run
> +            perl-json
> +            perl-libwww
> +            perl-list-compare
> +            perl-lwp-protocol-https
> +            perl-moo
> +            perl-uri))

Would it be possible to wrap relevant scripts, in a similar manner to
bioperl-minimal, and make most of these normal inputs instead of
propagated-inputs?

dpkg seems like something that could be patched to directly refer to a
version directly in the store.

> +    (home-page "https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/devscripts";)
> +    (synopsis "Scripts to make the life of a Debian Package maintainer 
> easier")
> +    (description "Scripts that assist Debian packagers.  Guix developers
> +may find the bts command useful for interacting with GNU's debbugs server.")

The description should contain full sentences. When you refer to bts,
I'd use @code{bts} Texinfo markup as well.

> +    (license license:gpl2)))

I did not check by going though all source files, but AFAICS, it's
gplv2+. Or does the gplv2 refer to the devscripts files and bts.pl? In
that case, a clarifying comment would be a welcome addition here.

>  (define-public debootstrap
>    (package
>      (name "debootstrap")
>
> base-commit: 40f53e8fb5b867e3a1e8fa798328423718282aac
> -- 
> 2.41.0

Thanks,
Jelle