|
From: | Benja Fallenstein |
Subject: | Re: [Gzz] Re: What is our Wiki for? (WAS: reST/Docutils Wiki and Navidoc) |
Date: | Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:15:32 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030714 Debian/1.4-2 |
Hermanni Hyytiälä wrote:
Why would wiki make a good starting point?1) Information categorization We could categorize things under different categories with links (e.g., "Tutorials", "Terms", "Best practices", "Documentation", "Tutorials/Fenfire project", "Tutorials/Subprojects", "Best Practices/LibVob", "Best Practices/Design Patterns" "Best Practices/Avoid these things", "Terms/Xanalogical model", "Terms/3D programming" &c).
...
I'd think we should use .rst for those things.If .rst files can do categorization then it should be fine ;).
Of course we can already use hierarchy, but we could also extend rst a little to make categorization more flexible. Suggestion: Add a header to rst pages::
===== Title ===== :Author: ... :Created: ... :Categories: Tutorials -> Fenfire project; Terms -> RDFThen, in the output the categories would be hyperlinked, and there would be auto-generated summary pages; a bit like in Tim Bray's ongoing_, where articles can also be in multiple categories (example_).
.. _ongoing: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/ .. _example: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/07/28/SummerPixI think it would be cool if it were possible to categorize everything that way, including PEGs, darts, and design documents...
- Benja
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |