Re: Do we need to bind to both RET and <return> variants?

[Stefan Monnier]

> For the return key (for Emacs GUI) and the C-m variant RET (in nowindow
> mode, terminal) to both work, should we be binding to both RET and <return>
> variants?

No, if you don't care about the difference, then bind only RET (which
will also apply to `return` because `return` is remapped to RET if
there's no binding specifically for it).

Same with TAB vs `tab`.

It's important to follow this convention, otherwise you mess up every
other package which does follow the convention (since your `return`
binding will then take precedence even if it's in a low-precedence map).


        Stefan