|
From: | Christina O'Donnell |
Subject: | Re: trivial-build-system: ld can't find existing store files |
Date: | Wed, 17 Jan 2024 20:49:16 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 |
Hi Simon,Okay I can believe this, I'm only just learning about the autoconf and co. I've already submitted a patch, but I'm happy to change it to gnu-build-system if it'll make it simpler. autoconf is more automatic than I've given it credit for!
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=68502I've put it on my list of things to get back to when I next have a clean checkout.
Kind regard, Christina O'Donnell On 17/01/2024 16:40, Simon Tournier wrote:
Hi, On Sun, 14 Jan 2024 at 11:10, Christina O'Donnell <cdo@mutix.org> wrote:So I'm trying to write a package with a single C file using trivial-build-system[1].Despite its name, trivial-build-system is the less trivial build-system. Hum, gnu-build-system appears to me better for one single C file, even if there is no Makefile. Felix provided how to use trivial-build-system. Well – aside I am not convinced that %build-inputs is a good way – as we see, many thing need to be configured by hand, when gnu-build-system does it for you. Cheers, simon
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |