[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] Brainstorm...
From: |
Cees de Groot |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] Brainstorm... |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Mar 2001 15:25:04 +0100 |
> Me and Dragomir have shared some brainstorming across the last week.
> Mainly about the possibility of interfacing Smalltalk to the Internet
> (Apache, SSL & encryption, RPC, etc.)
You really want to do this in a Camp Smalltalk context, I think. If there is
one problem with interfacing ST to the web, it is that there are too many ways
of doing it and one good CS solution is better than a lot of individual
things. Even though stuff like native threads is highly VM-dependent, I feel
there should be a common layer on top of it so the app-level people have a
substrate for building the higher levels (one of the problems with the current
state of ST web development: Comanche only on Squeak, WikiWorks only on VW,
etcetera).
Probably one of the best lower-level things to do would be an FCGI interface.
The FCGI model itself probably suggests other things you mentioned.
address@hidden said:
> (Have you ever read Joyce's Ulysses??)
When I had a customer in Basel, I was bored in my hotel for two nights a week
and that kept the speed up. When the assignment finished, I was two/thirds of
the way and since then I've never been able to get back into the damned book
;-)
--
Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com <address@hidden>
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD 1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B