help-smalltalk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] Brainstorm...


From: Cees de Groot
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Brainstorm...
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 15:25:04 +0100

> Me and Dragomir have shared some brainstorming across the last week.
> Mainly about the possibility of interfacing Smalltalk to the Internet
> (Apache, SSL & encryption, RPC, etc.)

You really want to do this in a Camp Smalltalk context, I think. If there is 
one problem with interfacing ST to the web, it is that there are too many ways 
of doing it and one good CS solution is better than a lot of individual 
things. Even though stuff like native threads is highly VM-dependent, I feel 
there should be a common layer on top of it so the app-level people have a 
substrate for building the higher levels (one of the problems with the current 
state of ST web development: Comanche only on Squeak, WikiWorks only on VW, 
etcetera).

Probably one of the best lower-level things to do would be an FCGI interface. 
The FCGI model itself probably suggests other things you mentioned.

address@hidden said:
> (Have you ever read Joyce's Ulysses??)

When I had a customer in Basel, I was bored in my hotel for two nights a week 
and that kept the speed up. When the assignment finished, I was two/thirds of 
the way and since then I've never been able to get back into the damned book 
;-)
-- 
Cees de Groot               http://www.cdegroot.com     <address@hidden>
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD  1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]