Re: [Help-smalltalk] st-mode.el optional hilit19

[Bonzini]

> I guess a possibility would be to split the browsing part out to a
> separate .el, which I see is how it was in the dim dark past.  I guess
> if it spat biggish chunks of code down to the running gst it might be
> able to get away without Browser.st too.

Actually some support for Smalltalk interaction is worth keeping
(evaluation, compilation of parts of .st files, etc.)

> Is the -p to support running as an emacs sub-process in general
> (rather than just for the browser)?  That feature (however
> implemented) might be worth keeping.

I don't remember... it involves putting some special markers in the output
that st-mode.el recognizes.

Paolo