Re: [Help-smalltalk] Verbosity

[Luca Bruno]

In data 02 ottobre 2006 alle ore 07:37:36, Paolo Bonzini  
<address@hidden> ha scritto:

> Luca Bruno wrote:
> > Hello,
> > sorry if my patches are really small, this is the first time i'm  
> > reading the code ;)
> No problem.  It's the right way to start.  Still, please configure your  
> mailer to encode them as text/plain rather than application/octet-stream.
> > However this patch set verbosity > 2 for both Scavenging messages and  
> > readline symbols traceback on SIGINT, which are pretty boring.
> The latter is wrong because in some cases (SIGSEGV) the backtrace is  
> necessary.  I'd prefer something like this:

I was looking at this:

case SIGINT:
      is_serious_error = false;
      if (!_gst_non_interactive && in_interpreter)
        {
          _gst_set_signal_handler (sig, interrupt_handler);
          stop_executing ("userInterrupt");
          return;
        }
      break;

Isn't ^C an user interruption?


>       if (is_serious_error || sig == SIGUSR1
>            || (_gst_verbosity > 2 && (ip || _gst_gc_running))
>
> Can you confirm that it works?
>
> Paolo

Is important to show backtrace for SIGUSR1 anyway if verbosity is less  
than 3?

       if (is_serious_error || (_gst_verbosity > 2 && (ip ||  
_gst_gc_running))

--
http://lethalman.blogspot.com - Thoughts about computer technologies