[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: amd 64 and gnu smalltalk
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: amd 64 and gnu smalltalk |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:05:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105) |
> No, I didn't- I only ever use the stable branch. I was tired when i
> asked the question
> and completely missed that the last stable gnu smalltalk in debian
> stable is a 2.1.x
> version. Usually they are good about keeping packages for gnu stuff up
> to date,
> must not have a maintainer for the gnu smalltalk anymore.
No, there is one (Thomas Girard). ISTR that testing is okay, probably
3.0.x or 3.1, because GNU Smalltalk missed by very little the deadline
for the last stabilization.
Paolo
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] GNU Smalltalk and unix integration.., (continued)
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] GNU Smalltalk and unix integration.., Paolo Bonzini, 2009/01/07
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] GNU Smalltalk and unix integration.., Sean Allen, 2009/01/07
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] GNU Smalltalk and unix integration.., Paolo Bonzini, 2009/01/07
- Re: [Help-smalltalk] GNU Smalltalk and unix integration.., Sean Allen, 2009/01/07
- [Help-smalltalk] Re: GNU Smalltalk and unix integration.., Paolo Bonzini, 2009/01/07
- [Help-smalltalk] Re: GNU Smalltalk and unix integration.., Sean Allen, 2009/01/07
- [Help-smalltalk] Re: GNU Smalltalk and unix integration.., Paolo Bonzini, 2009/01/07
- [Help-smalltalk] Re: GNU Smalltalk and unix integration.., Sean Allen, 2009/01/08
Re: [Help-smalltalk] Re: amd 64 and gnu smalltalk, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/01/05