[Help-smalltalk] Re: Logging facility for GNU-smalltalk

[Paolo Bonzini]

> > > Also, one could implement a "tee" like functionality, i.e.
> > > duplicating the log output on both stdout and a file. Or even
> > > piping it (eg via nc) to a remote location.
> > That's something, what I would like to see in the logging interface.
>
> No, that's something that can be useful outside logging, so it must be
> implemented as new kinds of stream.

I correct myself.  A multiplexing output handler can be useful in case 
you want to send HTML to a file and text to stdout.  This is orthogonal 
to having a multiplexing stream

Paolo